Seven Implications for Consideration

  • 1. The Bible Plus View of Revelation – employing the Catholic understanding of Revelation, the NAR has departed from the progress of the Protestant Reformation, favoring the RCC’s Bible Plus Tradition approach. Much of evangelicalism flirts with this (doctrine of illumination, Holy Spirit speaking today, etc.), along with liberties taken in Bible translation (formal equivalence versus dynamic equivalence[1]).
  • 2. The Hermeneutics of Dominionism – The NAR employs several hermeneutic models: theological, Christocentric, redemptive, and allegorical, all supporting continuationism and dominionism. The Genesis model for hermeneutics and the NT use of the OT suggests the literal grammatical historical model.
  • 3. The Theology of Dominionism – The NAR is impacting culture effectively both through and to this theology. Evangelical theology hasn’t effectively dealt with the cultural mandate undergirding dominionism.[2] Passages for consideration include Genesis 1-3, and 9, Matthew 5-13, and Revelation 19. Understanding a Biblical perspective on interacting with Wallnau’s seven mountains (religion, family, education, government, media, arts, and business) is also important.
  • 4. Experience and Sentiment Over Reason – creating a false dilemma of subjectivity versus objectivity, with emphasis on the Psalms over Pauline literature, for example. Have we dealt sufficiently with epistemological foundations – understanding the impact of Thomas Aquinas, Rene Descartes, David Hume, and Friederich Nietzsche?
  • 5. How to Handle the Music – previous postmillennial efforts have been primarily to affect government; this one has been aimed at culture through media and music, and thus is more grassroots, and more effective. On the one hand, there are songs that are theologically sound and effective in teaching truth. On the other hand, some former insiders have seen a major deficiency not only in some of the theology, but in the praxis of worship itself: “I saw what I was doing as a band member as not leading people in worship, but participating in ‘conjuring’ the Holy Spirit to ‘come down’. The Holy Spirit being defined as the euphoric feeling that the droning music creates.”[3] In examining the songs, it is evident that they are of differing quality and deserve consideration individually and on their own merits. There are three logical ways to approach this: (1) Reject anything produced by NAR advocates (beware the boycott syndrome), (2) Accept anything produced by NAR advocates (beware the need for discernment), (3) Reject some and accept others, exercising discernment.

The effectiveness and popularity of the music provides an occasion to examine the method and metrics by which we will assess the art. This presents an important aesthetics question that should be answered Biblically.

Examples

Consider the subtle dominionism of “Who Is Like the Lord”[4] by Highlands. The song speaks of current and earthly reign of Christ, and seems to confuse the roles of the Father and Son in the current age:

You’re seated on the throne of mercy

Your glory shining bright for all to see

Oh God I will praise you

Magnificent with grace unending

You rescue us with love that never fails

O God I will praise You

Who is like the Lord strong in battle

Who is like the Lord mighty to save

Who is like the Lord King forever

Jesus reigns Jesus reigns

I know that You are always with me

Your presence goes before and goes behind

Oh God I will praise You

You reign in all the earth

You reign in all the heavens You’re holy

You’re seated on the throne

Nothing can stand against You You’re holy

On the other hand, notice the Biblical-revelation focus of “Show us Christ”[5] from Sovereign Grace, a continuationist church that “encourage[s] churches to sing biblically informed, heartfelt, historically mindful music.”[6] Though there is some ambiguity in the song, it is attempting to draw attention to the value of the Bible.

Prepare our hearts O God

Help us to receive

Break the hard and stony ground

Help our unbelief

Plant Your Word down deep in us

‘Cause it to bear fruit

Open up our ears to hear

Lead us in Your truth

Show us Christ show us Christ

O God reveal Your glory

Through the preaching of Your Word

Until every heart confesses Christ is Lord

Your Word is living light

Upon our darkened eyes

Guards us through temptations

Makes the simple wise

Your Word is food for famished ones

Freedom for the slave

Riches for the needy soul

Come speak to us today

Where else can we go Lord

Where else can we go

You have the words of eternal life

Cory Asbury of Bethel Music sings of “The Reckless Love of God.”[7] The chorus of the song emphasizes the love of God but uses a highly questionable term (reckless). Is this merely poetic license, or is it misrepresenting the character of God?

Oh, the overwhelming, never-ending, reckless love of God
Oh, it chases me down, fights ’til I’m found, leaves the ninety-nine
And I couldn’t earn it, I don’t deserve it, still, You give Yourself away
Oh, the overwhelming, never-ending, reckless love of God, yeah

Bethel Music’s “King of My Heart”[8] extols the faithfulness of God and the believer’s response to him (as a subject to a king). The song is loaded with repetition and is light on theological depth. Does the repetition of the lyrics and dynamism of the music itself complement the simplicity of the message of trust, or does it represent a liturgical deficiency?

Let the King of my heart
Be the mountain where I run
The fountain I drink from
Oh, He is my song
Let the King of my heart
Be the shadow where I hide
The ransom for my life
Oh, He is my song

‘Cause You are good
You are good, oh oh
You are good
You are good, oh oh
You are good
You are good, oh oh
You are good
You are good, oh oh

And let the King of my heart
Be the wind inside my sails
The anchor in the waves
Oh oh, He is my song
Let the King of my heart
Be the fire inside my veins
The echo of my days
Oh oh, He is my song

Let the King of my heart
Be the wind inside my sails
The anchor in the waves
Oh oh, He is my song
Let the King of my heart
Be the fire inside my veins
The echo of my days
Oh, He is my song

‘Cause You are good
You are good, oh oh
You are good
You are good, oh oh
You are good
You are good, oh oh
You are good
You are good, oh oh

You’re never gonna let
You’re never gonna let me down
And You’re never gonna let
You’re never gonna let me down
You’re never gonna let
You’re never gonna let me down
You’re never gonna let
You’re never gonna let me down

You’re never gonna let
You’re never gonna let
You’re never gonna let me down
You’re never gonna let 
You’re never gonna let me down
You’re never gonna let 
You’re never gonna let me down

Oh ’cause You are good
You are good, oh oh
‘Cause You are good
You are good, oh oh
‘Cause You are good
You are good, oh oh
You are good
You are good, oh oh

You’re never gonna let
You’re never gonna let me down
You’re never gonna let 
You’re never gonna let me down
You’re never gonna let 
You’re never gonna let me down
You’re never gonna let 
You’re never gonna let me down

‘Cause You are good
You are good, oh oh
You are good
You are good, oh oh

Hillsong United’s “Another in the Fire”[9] illustrates another common technique of bringing OT imagery (in this case, the deliverance of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego in Daniel 3) to the believer’s present experience. Is this an appropriate use of the OT, that helps a believer grow in their trust of God based on His previous works (like the Psalmists would refer to earlier works of God), or is it a misapplication that supports supersessionism and continuationism?

There’s a grace when the heart is under fire
Another way when the walls are closing in
And when I look at the space between
Where I used to be and this reckoning
I know I will never be alone

There was another in the fire
Standing next to me
There was another in the waters
Holding back the seas
And should I ever need reminding
Of how I’ve been set free
There is a cross that bears the burden
Where another died for me
There is another in the fire

All my debt left for dead beneath the waters
I’m no longer a slave to my sin anymore
And should I fall in the space between
What remains of me and this reckoning
Either way I won’t bow to the things of this world
And I know I will never be alone

There is another in the fire
Standing next to me
There is another in the waters
Holding back the seas
And should I ever need reminding
What power set me free
There is a grave that holds no body
And now that power lives in me
There is another in the fire, oh
There is another in the fire, whoa
There is another in the fire, whoa
There is another in the fire, oh
I can see

And I can see the light in the darkness
As the darkness bows to Him
I can hear the roar in the heavens
As the space between wears thin
I can feel the ground shake beneath us
As the prison walls cave in
Nothing stands between us
Nothing stands between us

There is no other name but the name that is Jesus
He who was and still is, and will be through it all
So come what may in the space between
All the things unseen and this reckoning
And I know I will never be alone
And I know I will never be alone

There’ll be another in the fire
Standing next to me
There’ll be another in the waters
Holding back the seas
And should I ever need reminding
How good You’ve been to me
I’ll count the joy come every battle
‘Cause I know that’s where You’ll be
I can see the light

And I can see the light in the darkness
As the darkness bows to Him
I can hear the roar in the heavens
As the space between wears thin
I can feel the ground shake beneath us
As the prison walls cave in
Nothing stands between us
Nothing stands between

There’ll be another in the fire
Standing next to me
There’ll be another in the waters
Holding back the seas
And should I ever need reminding
How good You’ve been to me
I’ll count the joy come every battle
‘Cause I know that’s where You’ll be

Count the joy come every battle
‘Cause I know that’s where You’ll be
I’ll count the joy come every battle
‘Cause I know that’s where You’ll be, sing it again
I’ll count the joy come every battle
‘Cause I know that’s where You’ll be
I’ll count the joy come every battle
‘Cause I know that’s where You’ll be

  • 6. Some Positive Aspects of the NAR – The theology of the NAR is in some cases significantly different from what is represented by the plain sense of Scripture, and that must be dealt with and addressed. At the same time, there is value in addressing the negatives while learning from the positives – three of which are identified by this writer: (1) The NAR expends great effort and resource to maintain consistency between theology, praxis, and liturgy. (2) The NAR is attempting to be comprehensive in efforts to positively impact the culture. (3) The NAR demonstrates commitment to excellence in the “product,” showing some cultural leadership rather than simply mimicking tools employed by secular influencers.

Perhaps we can challenge NAR advocates in core epistemological foundations, hermeneutic and exegetical method, and certain theological conclusions all while appreciating that they are demonstrating some methodology in reaching the present generation.

  • 7. The Tenor of the Discussion – The differences and distinctions should not be ignored, particularly where there is divergence from the Scriptures. Also we should keep the end goal in mind. Michael Brown (considered by some to be part of the NAR, though denying it himself) suggests five ways to handle the discussion constructively. Though we might disagree on some aspects, the concerns and recommendations he raises are thoughtworthy: “First, get rid of the extreme rhetoric (“not Christian”; “aberrant movement”; etc.). You’re slandering your brothers and sisters. Second, drop the general term NAR. It’s ambiguous at best and misleading at worst and should only be used with reference to the organization once led by Peter Wagner. Third, don’t put widely disparate groups under the same heading. That only leads to confusion. Fourth, identify the beliefs or practices you question, be sure you rightly understand them from an insider perspective, then respond to them based on Scripture and fruit. Fifth, recognize the wonderful things the Spirit is doing around the world today.”[10]

God is certainly working today, and His Spirit is undoubtedly very active, but He gets to define that activity, and He gets to decide how and to what extent that activity is revealed. The views and efforts of the NAR provide us an important occasion to revisit our core, foundational understandings of the basis of authority in our lives. How can we answer the question of who God is, and how can we be certain that have answered the question correctly. The Bible asserts that it is and provides the answer. The NAR takes us back to a time when the question of methodology was answered by going beyond what is written. The NAR confronts us, through the seriousness of its contemporary apostolic and prophetic claims, with the simplicity of the question of foundational truth. How we answer that question will set the course of our understanding of God and of what He expects of us.


[1] Christopher Cone, “How to Choose a Bible Translation, Part 1” https://drcone.com/2016/04/15/how-to-choose-a-bible-translation-part-1/.

[2] For more on this, see Christopher Cone, Redacted Dominionism: A Biblical Approach to Grounding Environmental Responsibility (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2012).

[3] “Personal Testimonies: Leaving the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) Movement,” 3/15/2017, viewed at https://thenarrowingpath.com/2017/03/15/personal-testimonies-leaving-the-new-apostolic-reformation-nar-movement/.

[4] CJ Blount, Justin Bradshaw, Nicole McLean, © 2018 Highlands Creative Publishing.

[5] Bob Kauflin and Doug Plank, © 2011 Sovereign Grace Praise..

[6] https://sovereigngrace.com/music/.

[7] Caleb Culver, Cory Asbury, Ran Jackson, © 2018 Bethel Music Publishing.

[8] John Mark McMillan and Sarah McMillan, © 2017 Capitol Christian Music Group.

[9] Chris Davenport and Joel Houston, © 2019 Capitol Christian Music Group.

[10] Michael Brown, “Dispelling the Myths About NAR (the New Apostolic Reformation),” Christian Post, May 3, 2018, viewed at https://www.christianpost.com/voice/dispelling-myths-new-apostolic-reformation-michael-brown.html.